On 7/16/07, Christopher Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 05:16:32PM -0500, Jeff Dege wrote: > > I think that's the problem. It's assuming that if it uses > > gml:coordinates, it's GML2, and if it's using gml:pos or gml:posList, > > it's GML3, and that if it's GML2, it only has two dimensions. > > > > Now I'm not sure whether ogr is incorrect in using three dimensions in a > > gml:coordinates element, or whether the GML format class is incorrect in > > assuming that the lack of gml:pos or gml:posList indicates two > > dimensions. But if it's a bug in OGR, it's going to be a widespread > > one. > > > > > Can you > > > put up a full GML file generated by ogr2ogr in this way so that it can > > > be examined by developers who might be able to improve the parser to > > > handle this case? > > > > I'm using the ogr2ogr bundled in MS4W version 2.0 - which seems to be > > gdal/ogr version 1.3.2. > > > I've attached the input and output files, and copied the email to you > > since I'm not sure the list will accept the attachments. > > > Great. This is clearly a bug, and should be fixed in the Format.GML > class. > > Erik, can you file a ticket for this, marked for 2.5, and attach the > output file to the ticket as an attachment so we don't lose it? That way > I'll have the data to test against when I'm fixing it. >
at yer service :-) http://trac.openlayers.org/ticket/846 > Jeff, I assume you don't mind if we use the GML data in question as data > for our unit tests? > > Regards, > -- > Christopher Schmidt > MetaCarta > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/users
