Okay, that was nothing short of embarrasingly simple :) Thanks a lot, you just made my top 3 people of the month.
Kind regards, Gissur -----Original Message----- From: Christopher Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27. febrúar 2008 15:18 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OpenLayers-Users] WFS giving me lip On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 03:07:19PM -0000, Gissur Þórhallsson wrote: > Thanks for your comprehensive reply. > > Why do you recommend using Vector features over WFS? > > I would still have to populate the Vector feature with a call to my WFS > server, and the way it looks to me, that could be something of a hassle. > > I was thinking of what you wrote regardin my document not being correctly > parsed, so I tried pasting the output from geoserver that is failing to parse > for me, which I can see using firebug, into > http://openlayers.org/dev/examples/vector-formats.html and that worked fine. > > So I'm thinking of folliwing your advice, but wondering is whether I can use > Vector layers with a WFS data source consistently. Yes. Just drop the 'featureClass' option off the definition of your Layer.WFS. Regards, -- Christopher Schmidt MetaCarta _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/users No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.1/1300 - Release Date: 26.2.2008 19:50 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.1/1300 - Release Date: 26.2.2008 19:50 _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/users
