That's what I thought... Thank you very much, Eric. Alexandre
Eric Lemoine wrote: > Hi. It looks like that if you set minScale/maxScale OpenLayers takes > it as "calculate the intermediate resolutions". I cannot think of > something better than pass your layer a scale array. I may be missing > it though. Cheers. Eric > > 2008/9/8, Alexandre Dube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Hi everybody, >> >> I need some explanations regarding minScale/maxScale with 'scales' >> array set on map, please. >> >> Release/2.7/Note >> Layer : >> minScale' and 'maxScale' properties no longer ignored if 'scales' >> array set on map. (#1199 <http://trac.openlayers.org/ticket/1199>) >> >> Yeah, they are not ignored, but only both theses scales correspond the >> actual map scales, not the ones between them. >> >> For example, I have the following scales set for my map : >> >> scales: [13000000, 8000000, 4000000, 2000000, 1000000, 500000, 250000, >> 100000, 50000, 25000, 10000] >> >> If I set minScale: 1000000, maxScale: 100000 to a layer and then check >> its scales array, I get the following : >> index : value >> 0 : 1000000.0000000001 >> 1 : 464158.8833612779 // instead of 500000 >> 2 : 215443.46900318837 // instead of 250000 >> 3 : 99999.99999999999 >> >> I can understand how theses values are set this way. >> I don't know why they do. >> Are the values ok ? Will this affect anything ? ( because they are >> different than the scales from the map ) >> I don't understand why the layer could not have the values in the scales >> array of the map directly instead of calculating its own... >> >> Sorry for the long e-mail. I only need some explanations, please. >> >> -- >> Alexandre Dubé >> Mapgears >> www.mapgears.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> -- Alexandre Dubé Mapgears www.mapgears.com _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/users
