Hi,

most of the changes are descirbed here,

http://trac.openlayers.org/ticket/2251

however there should not be any *API* changes, but it seems your usage was the 
internal structures and not the API right?

Best regards,
Bart

On May 10, 2010, at 8:02 PM, myOpenLayersUName wrote:

> 
> There seems to be some pretty significant differences between the hierarchy
> of the context that is returned after the read_wmc_Layer function is run in
> OpenLayers 2.8 vs. 2.9. 
> 
> In 2.8, there is actually a layer created with params and options attached.
> In 2.9, there seems to be only an associative array added to a
> "layersContext" object that doesn't have a layer in it at all.
> 
> Can someone point me to some documentation that discusses the changes
> between the two versions? Perhaps a mapping chart to tell me where I will
> find the pieces of information imported now? For example, in 2.8, a lot of
> the layer's Server information was placed in the params object under
> layerInfo. In our code, we needed used the Server's title attribute from our
> WMCs as well, and extended the Format read to read that title attribute and
> append it to the layerInfo.params object as well. Now, it's looking like I'm
> just appending title to the layerContext object and I'm uncertain what other
> things are found in that object. Is the layer's title already in there?
> 
> Also, how does the layer itself get created now if the Format read isn't
> doing so? 
> 
> Basically, 2.9 appears so completely different from 2.8, I can't get it to
> work for our application anymore and am facing a pretty significant re-write
> to adjust. The fact that I can't find anything in any documentation (release
> notes even) that mentions that it is happening is a little frightening.
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
> http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/OpenLayers-Format-WMC-v1-in-2-8-vs-2-9-tp5032030p5032030.html
> Sent from the OpenLayers Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to