On 3/16/2013 8:15 AM, Jim - FooBar(); wrote:
*@ James,*
as you 've probably gathered, we weren't able to resolve the coref
discrepancies between the 2 of us...did you have any luck running the
coref component on the standard example sentence, using trunk and the
latest wordnet, as originally requested? Doing this will help us
determine which one of the outputs we are comparing is more
appropriate. Ant B's output certainly *seems* more correct (from an
NLP persective) but I'm not giving up unless I find out *why* it is
more correct and *why* I'm not getting the same...I totally understand
that you are probably very very busy these days, with the upcoming
1.5.3 release and all, but wouldn't it be nice to know that the coref
component has not been affected after all the fixes? presumably you
must have tests in place...
many many thanks,
Jim
Jim,
I didn't forget you... but, have been busy on the release for 1.5.3.
I think my problems are more of a configuration issue with the coref
component in the DOS/Windows CLI. I think the dictionary isn't being
loaded properly for the component. I'll try to get back to this
sometime after the release to verify everything is okay. I don't
believe there is anything wrong with coref .... I just haven't used it;
but, know the theory behind what it needs to do.
James
