> Il giorno 01/ott/2013, alle ore 21:31, Jörn Kottmann <[email protected]> ha > scritto: > >> On 10/01/2013 09:03 PM, Giorgio Valoti wrote: >> >>>> Il giorno 01/ott/2013, alle ore 20:48, Jörn Kottmann <[email protected]> >>>> ha scritto: >>>> >>>> On 10/01/2013 07:36 PM, Giorgio Valoti wrote: >>>> I'd be interested in creating an annotated corpus for Italian or at least >>>> to begin the process. The first problem for me is finding an annotation >>>> guide. Does anyone have some links? >>>> >>>> Re. brat. I have a little familiarity with GATE. How do they compare? Are >>>> they even comparable? >>> The nice thing about wikinews is that it is available in many languages and >>> we could probably develop some cross language >>> principles. >> What do you mean by "principles"? Are you talking about the guidelines? > > Yes. > >>> I never really used GATE, not sure how that could work out. Brat is web >>> based and could easily be used by >>> multiple users. I guess that would fit our needs quite well. >>> >>> How is your experience with GATE? >> (Please keep in mind that I'm a GATE expert.) >> >> It's a very mature tool, with a bunch of features and a robust architecture. >> For example, I swapped out the default POS tagger with OpenNLP's in zero >> time. Nothing fancy, but it just worked. > > We need a tool where a user can manually annotate/correct the data. How is > you experience doing that with GATE?
I don't know :) right now I'm working (well, I'm knee deep in mud) to integrate/use GATE within a Clojure project. I've read the docs about this aspect, i.e. about collaborating to annotate documents, a few months ago, but I don't remember the details. I hope to get back tomorrow with a brief comparison between GATE and brat. -- Giorgio Valoti
