On 10/30/2013 12:03 PM, Nils Reiter wrote:
I guess the question is whether a trained model is an “adaptation” of the work
according to the license. If that’s the case you’re bound to using creative
commons, I think.
The model does not contain the original texts, it contains the words and
bigrams,
but that nothing the original author has a copyright on.
It should be ok to license the model under a different license.
Do you intend to have a different license for the annotations as well?
Any interest to contribute your work back to OpenNLP? It would really be
a great start for us
to finally have some annotated data as proper Open Source as well. The
wikipedia effort can probably
easily be replicated for other languages.
Jörn
