On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Fernando Cassia <fcas...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oh sweet irony, right after downloading AOO 4.0, and before one even > gets a chance to install it, you get the same FUD review from a LO > zealot as part of the SF.Net redirect to the reviews section... > http://img580.imageshack.us/img580/1351/3ni.png > > (those are SourceForge.net's user-submitted reviews, which shows the > highest scoring review "vs" the lowest scoring one). > > Strangely, it doesn't matter if you select "most helpful" or "sorted > by date" afterwards from the drop down at the bottom of that page, the > displayed reviews do not change, it's always the same 5-star, one-line > review that says "a great alternative" vs the 1-star review full of > AOO FUD from someone who says "use LO instead". > > I feel tempted to write a one-star review that reads "I'm a > LibreOffice troll and I hate to see AOO 4.0 released!" and see if it > gets displayed :-P. >
Or even better, write a real good review, praising AOO, but give it only 1-star. We'll benefit more from the good review than we will be hurt by a single-star review. -Rob > FC > -- > During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary > act > - George Orwell > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org
