Sorry not to mention my context: OOo 1.1.3 and WinXP Pro SP2.
If you said you cannot reproduce my symptoms and the newer version is 1.1.4, I think its already solved in it. I'm a little bit conservative and prefer to wait the launch of version 2 to update. It will be next April, won't it?
All best,
BS
----- Original Message ----- From: "G. Roderick Singleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, 15 February, 2005 11:58 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Table: merging upper/lower cells disrupt theirfixed-height property
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 07:37 +0700, Bambang Suryobroto wrote:Hi there;
I made a multirow-multicollumn table and defined the row heights fixed. When
I merged cells upper/lower adjacent cells, the resulting cell didn't inherit
their fixed-height property. Therefore when the resulting cell was filled
its height changed accordingly.
The trouble was that the row height didn't get back to its original height
even when the cell was emptied. However, if it's the left/right cells which
was merged, the cell could go back to its original height.
Did I miss something?
Since I cannot reproduce your symptoms, I can only assume you are using an old version of OOo. Perhaps if you tell us your OS and version of OOo, we can offer more help. -- Documentation Co-Lead PLEASE - keep list traffic on the list. Email sent directly to me may be ignored utterly.
"Dinna meddle wi' things ye ken nuthin' aboot!" J.Herriot
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
