On Wednesday 16 February 2005 05:04, Jonathon Blake wrote: > G Roderick Singleton wrote: > > Why throw good money after bad. I recall a long discussion about use of > > HSQLDB and how it was superior to SQLite et cetera.
I only passed the messager on for those who may be interested and unwilling to actually step up to do the work themselves. > http://dba.openoffice.org/miscellaneous/dba20.html#whynot_sqlite > claims that HSQLDB is the only one that met their requirements. > > What are those requirements? The link on that page is dead. > The Way Back Machine did not archive that page, because of the > Robots.txt message. I think that you should also be able to find it in the archives for the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. [snip] > OTOH, if one of the requirements is that everything must be written in > Java, then HSQLDB makes sense. > > Is this why OOo 2.0 RC1 was not released in Dec 2004, as scheduled? > [Especially since there was an announcement to that effect in late > October.] No, it was "normal" development/testing/bug-fixing delays. Having said that, there seem to be many more pieces in OOo 2 which will depend on java. Please follow up to either [EMAIL PROTECTED] or discuss@ -- CPH : openoffice.org contributor Maybe your question has been answered already? http://user-faq.openoffice.org/#FAQ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
