* Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020305, 10:54]:
> i don't think there should be any problems running oo.org on 2.2,
> although i'm not sure about what other components oo.org depends on.
I confirm having run OOo-1.1.3 on Woody (k 2.2.22). There should be no
problems with 1.1.4 (no dramatic changes as compared to 1.1.3).
>
> if this system is running 2.2 (and appropriate other components) for
> performance reasons then oo.org could be unusable on that system, but as
> long as system requirements are met it should be ok.
>
> sime wrote:
> >Ennio-Sr wrote:
> >
> >>>Does anyone know wether OOorg runs on Linux 2.2 systems (Kernel 2.2.x)?
> >>
> >>I'm running OOo-1.1.4 (the latest stable version) on a Debian/Sarge
> >>using Kernel 2.4.27 and it works OK. I managed also to download and set
> >>working one of the earlier pre-pre-pre-alpha versions (1.9.62) ;-)
> >>Regards,
> >> Ennio.
> >
> >What does that have to do with the posters original question? Poster is
> >refering to 2.2 kernels not 2.4
Dont'you think it could have been an 'Oooops'? On the other hand ther is
a common factor: '2' :-)
Regards,
Ennio
--
[Perche' usare Win$ozz (dico io) se ..."anche uno sciocco sa farlo. \\?//
Fa' qualche cosa di cui non sei capace!" (diceva Henry Miller) ] (�|�)
[Why use Win$ozz (I say) if ... "even a fool can do that. )=(
Do something you aren't good at!" (as Henry Miller used to say) ]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
