My understanding is that version 2.0 is using a different format for its standard document, and that his change is occasioned by claims from MS on XML.On 2 Apr 2005 at 12:28, Chris BONDE wrote:
When you say beta 2.0 has own file types, are they just different extensions or actual difference in file layout. I undersatnd that the .swx is a zipped file with at least three files inside.
Chris
Both versions have files within zipped files, but they are different formats. Ver 2.0 conforms to the OASIS standard.
My question then is this; will 2.0 and following versions still be able to open .sxw documents? Or should I go through all my files and convert all .sxws to .rtfs?
Or have I got the wrong information, or wrong problem?
Thanks,
JimW
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
