Hi everyone, I want to file an issue about absolute and relative paths because the current implementation does not make much sense to me. Before I do that, I'd like some input from others to see if there is a reasoning I have missed.
Paths to linked graphics are stored either absolute or relative, depending on how they were specified when the graphics was first used. But always displayed in absolute format. This seems non-sensical, if I used a relative path I want to see ../../path/to/file or similar. If I use an absolute path I want to see /full/path/to/file (these are Linux paths, modify as necessary for Windows platform). I also want to be able to change path type at will. It can't be hard to implement it this way, it also makes sense to the user. Have I missed something which explains the reasoning behind the actual implementation? Alan -- Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] +27 82 337 1935 (C) +27 86 110 2411 (W) +27 12 349 9277 (F) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
