Windows Vista Home Professional.

OO Ver. 2.4.1 Installed today but downloaded a couple of weeks ago.

File name was NDTSMain.mdb. Base didn't like it when I tried Access
2007 so that's why I went to plain Access. Trouble was that Access
support was at the top of the list but that wasn't where Base started
me in the list so I didn't see it at first. I saw the Access 2007
option in the list, tried it, failed, and then looked up at the top to
find plain Access support.

Once Base is up I can click on Queries, Forms and Files. I don't see
anything but there isn't a problem. As soon as I click on Tables I see
this message:

The connection to the data source "New Database2" could not be established.
Not a valid password.

Everything in the Base GUI that might try to get into the databse
fails with similar messages...

I can send yo a copy of the file off list if you want to look at it.
Just let me know.

Cheers,
Mark


On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Barbara Duprey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the file extension is .mdb, not .mdbx, it shouldn't be an Access 2007
> file. But most of the OOo versions don't yet even try to handle Office 2007
> files, so that option surprises me. What platform are you on, and where did
> your OOo version come from? There may certainly be something about your
> environment that's relevant to this.
>
> Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> Barbara,
>>   The file is created by a program called Trading Solutions which
>> apparently has some version of Access in it. TS does not use any
>> passwords at the user interface level. However I suppose that
>> internally it might use a password embedded in the program that I
>> never see just so they can protect their intellectual property in the
>> database. I don't know.
>>
>>   To be clear, I created this .mdb file in TS myself by simply
>> creating a new portfolio. TS makes a new directory with all the files
>> but no detailed stock contents. It would normally then wait for me to
>> add some stocks, equations, neural networks, etc., but I only wanted
>> to view the default contents of the database before any of that was
>> added.
>>
>>   Base never asked for a password. It just said it was invalid.
>>
>>   I can create new .mdb files any time. I tried again and got the same
>> results.
>>
>>   What are the chances this is an Access revision compatibility
>> issue. I saw two options that said Access in the Base file type list.
>> The Access 2007 didn't work so I used the plain Access file type.
>> Maybe Base doesn't really understand the exact level of Access TS is
>> using...
>>
>>   Asking the other user for files defeats the purpose of what he and
>> I are trying to do, but I can certainly ask him if he used a password
>> to get in. I'll do that and respond back to you and NoOp later. (Might
>> be a day. He's in Australia, I'm in California...)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mark
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Barbara Duprey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hmm. Connection to an existing database is what you want, but it sounds
>>> as
>>> if the Access file is password protected, so you'd need that to open it
>>> and
>>> see the tables. You won't be able to view or copy in the tables until you
>>> have at least read access to the mdb file. But did it ever ask for a
>>> password, or just say it was invalid? If the latter, you'd have to be
>>> able
>>> to get an unprotected version of the file before Base can get at it. Or
>>> maybe the file was corrupted somehow, I don't know if Base would assume
>>> an
>>> unreadable file was encrypted. In either case, I think you'll have to get
>>> the mdb file again. Since the other user you mentioned was able to get at
>>> the mdb file in OOo, maybe he can copy in the tables and send you an odb
>>> file with them already there?
>>>
>>> Thanks for the pointers, NoOp, I'm going to read that material myself.
>>> I've
>>> brought in several Access databases, but always just to capture the
>>> tables
>>> and recreate my queries and reports in Base.
>>>
>>> Mark Knecht wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Barbara,
>>>>  Thanks for the response. I don't need any forms from Access. Mostly
>>>> I'm just looking to poke around in the database itself so I can see
>>>> what's there. I don't have a copy of Access but heard from another
>>>> user that Access is used in this app. I also heard from him that he's
>>>> opened the database with Open Office so it should be doable.
>>>>
>>>>  However, when I try opening the database I first start Base and
>>>> then choose the file called NDTSMain.mdb. Base acts like it's OK with
>>>> the file but then what I get is Writer showing a bunch of gibberish.
>>>>
>>>>  Maybe I'm doing this completely wrong. Does the database file have
>>>> to be imported into OO before Base can access it? If I ask base to
>>>> connect to an existing database (instead of open an existing database)
>>>> it does see the file so that's good. This pops up a databse GUI of
>>>> some sort. I can click on Queries, Forms or Reports and I don't have
>>>> problems. (I don't see anything, but I don't have problems.) When I
>>>> click on Tables it complains that it cannot connect, invalid password.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Barbara Duprey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Mark Knecht wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is any part of Open Office able to read/modify files that are used in
>>>>>> a Windows app based around Access?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can supply a simple file if it's a matter of testing. I've never
>>>>>> messed with database programs so I know nothing about this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Mark
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The database component, Base, can be connected to Access tables, which
>>>>> can
>>>>> be used in place or copied into Base's HSQLdb engine. But the other
>>>>> parts
>>>>> of
>>>>> the Access database (forms, queries, reports) and anything like
>>>>> programs
>>>>> or
>>>>> scripts built for custom processing, are not available to Base. It uses
>>>>> a
>>>>> completely different structure. It has the capabilities to create or
>>>>> support
>>>>> analogous items, though, so it depends on how complex the Access
>>>>> database
>>>>> and other things are to determine whether this is feasible in your
>>>>> case.
>>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to