* Eike Rathke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [240505, 20:56]:
> Hi Ennio-Sr,
> 
> On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 23:54:32 +0200, Ennio-Sr wrote:
> 
> > I have a doubt about the way drag&drop operates with named ranges that
> > is hopefully explained by this example:
> > In the following Ss, A1 is a named range 'nra1'
> > ----------------------------------
> >   |     A           B
> > ----------------------------------
> > 1 |    10       =nra1*2 (-->20)       
> > 2 |    20            ???
> > 3 |    30            ???
> > 
> > Drag&copying cell B1 in B2 and B3 will always yield the same result as
> > for cell B1, i.e. '20', whereas I would expect '40' and '60'.
> > This means that the named range is considered as a fixed ref ($A$1) and
> > as such is copied to the other cells.
> 
> This depends on how the named range is defined. If it is defined as
> $A$1, for example, it is an absolute address that doesn't change when
> copying formulas. If the name was defined to read A1 instead it is
> adapted when the formula is copied. Note that when defining names using
> relative addresses the current cell cursor position is relevant. For
> your example you'd have to position the cursor on cell B1 before opening
> the "define name" dialog, and then specify A1 as address, resulting in
> a range "one column to the left, same row".
> 
> > IIRC the behaviour was different
> > in Lotus (cannot verify at the moment); in similar circumstances, if:
> > . cell A2 was also a named range, cell B2 would become =nra2*2,
> >   otherwise it would be reported as: A2*2
> 
> Which would be yet something different.
> 
> > Could somebody confirm this is a feature and not a bug?
> 
> It is a feature and not a bug ;-)
> 
>   Eike
> 
> -- 
>  OOo/SO Calc core developer. Number formatter bedevilled I18N 
> transpositionizer.
>  GnuPG key 0x293C05FD:  997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3  9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD

Thanks for your excellent explanation, Eike; in the meantime I came to
the same conclusion after a few more experiments ;). 
I found out why this was happening also (see issue #49425).
Best regards,
         Ennio.

-- 
[Perche' usare Win$ozz (dico io) se ..."anche uno sciocco sa farlo.   \\?//
 Fa' qualche cosa di cui non sei capace!"  (diceva Henry Miller) ]    (�|�)
[Why use Win$ozz (I say) if ... "even a fool can do that.              )=(
 Do something you aren't good at!" (as Henry Miller used to say) ]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to