IMHO I keep files in both .sxw and .odt. If it is important and since .odt is only opened in 2.0Beta I prefer to keep it in .sxw because I _know_ that 1.1.4 will open just fine.
Its up to personal choice really. /paul On 5/30/05, R D McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In beta 2, Document Converter is found in File; Wizard; Document Converter; > > Several times it has frozen up on me, without finishing; > > The previous run I called for a manual Yes to each question of > Overwriting the existing file; I did this to find out how far the > previous Conversions had gone; > > And it did pretty well this time: It got to 159 overwrites out of 189 > total, before crashing; > > [On previous crashes of the Converter, there was a "writer" error.] > > After restarting, I ran Doc Conv again, but put in No Overwriting this > time, and it ran through the remaining files in a split second. > > However, I do not understand the numbers of files reported: > > Of the 189 files reported to have been up for Conversion, the Log > File showed only 8; > > Yet, in searching and comparing both *.sxw and *.odt, it looks to be > a full conversion? > > > So, I will assume as much while I gradually compare individual files. > > > *QUESTION:* > > *Does anyone see a need for retaining both sets of files: The old sxw's, > when there are the new odt's? [I have removed 42 of the old ones to > Recycle Bin as a test.] .............. Any help on this?* > > > richard mcb > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
