I kept getting the following email
"error" message.
Does anyone know what it all about?
=================================================
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:37:29 +0200
Resent-From: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:37:22 +0200
From: [email protected]
To: Web Kracked <[email protected]>
The original message was received at 2009-04-23 08:34:02 +0200
from postoffice.local [10.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<[email protected]>
-----Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to postoffice.local.:
RCPT To:<[email protected]>
<<< 550 5.1.1 unknown or illegal alias: [email protected]
550 <[email protected]>... User unknown
NoOp wrote:
> On 04/22/2009 03:48 PM, Web Kracked wrote:
>> OK
>> Finally it came up "there" after 20 minutes of trying.
>>
>> By-the-by
>>
>> When is 3.1 coming out?
>> I keep forgetting.
>>
>> I have/teach the web class on May 2nd.
>
> There was a recent 'mirror cleanup' & you may have gotten caught in that.
>
> 3.1rc2 will come out first - there are still a lot of acknowledged
> regression bugs that need to be resolved before 3.1 final will be
released.
>
> Release status meeting minutes are here:
>
<http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/ReleaseStatus_Minutes#2009-04-20>
>
> Schedule is here:
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OOoRelease31
>
> There are a lot of good folks working on the issues, so if you plan to
> run 3.1rcX *please* be sure to: 1) review the existing/outstanding bugs,
> and 2) if you discover a _new_ bug report it immediately so that it can
> be reviewed & possibly fixed before 3.1Final.
>
> *Please* bottom post.
>
>> Web Kracked wrote:
>>>
>>> I went to the Release Candidate download area.
>>> I got this message when I tried to download the listed
>>> RC1 with or without JRE.
>>>
>>> =============
>>> Not Found
>>> The requested URL
/pub/openoffice/extended/3.1.0rc1/OOo_3.1.0rc1_20090402_Win32Intel_install_en-US.exe
was not found on this server.
> [snip]
>
>
most likely that is what happened.
when all types were missing, that did not
look correct.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
