>> >> Note that this document compares ODT with DOCX, not OOo with MSO. >> >> >> > >> > No, it doesn't. It claims to, then shows which Microsoft Word >> > features can be saved, partially saved, or not saved in ODT format. >> > In short, it compares Word with ODT (One a program and one a file >> > format). >> >> That is a valid statement, only because of this: >> >> > saying it is that Office 2007 DOCX is more tightly integrated with >> > Word that ODT - Well duh! They were designed together to support >> > each other. >> >> Which validates my statement. > > Not if you are using OO.o! Only if you have shelled out for a bad > product.
I do not understand that statement. You are right, docx has a one-to-one relationship with MS Word. Which office suit any particular user uses does not change this. > One which doesn't support either of the new international > standard XML file formats out of the box. > I love this statement! > A program designed to support a file save format, and a file save format > designed to support a program smells somewhat like a vendor lock-in > scenario. Yes, exactly. MS is known for this. Note that I personally don't think that this is 'evil', I think that it is business. > All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall > be well > I have a feeling that something was lost in the translation. What is the difference between the different parts? -- Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com http://gibberish.co.il --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
