On Jan 5, 2010, at 6:21 PM, Sean wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Barbara Duprey" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 5:48 PM > Subject: Re: [users] OOo LiveCD > > >>> It's funny how everybody posts visible messages just to flame me. >>> And it's sad. Really sad. >>> When I started using OOo I never dreamed that in the midst would be > elitists >>> who would get a real kick out of jumping on one of their own users who >>> happens to be (in their minds) somehow different. >> If you looked at the post archives from most of the people you are >> accusing of flaming you, you would see that we're about as far from >> elitist as is possible. Most of us do not use the same technique he >> does, so you see our messages. But his technique is perfectly valid, and >> all decent email clients show the content without having to open an >> attachment. Yours does not. That's YOUR problem, not his or ours. Your >> willful disregard of the perfectly correct answers you have gotten -- >> well, it's sad. Really sad. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > Well. I realize that I too have had enough of this nonsense as it seems > everyone else has. > For some strange reason I can read this message you posted. > When others post blank messages it seems they are ignored. Forgiven.
Others aren't posting blank messages, except for a few accidental ones. I don't know if Outlook Express has a "View Source" feature, but as EVERYONE has pointed out, we can ALL see the text in PiT's messages. Only you can't. Yet instead of accepting that you might have a problem, you insist it's everyone else's problem -- and you don't realize that many of that "everyone else" group has FAR more programming and tech experience than you have. Is it getting old? YES. Why? Because we see Sean saying, "Your messages are messed up!" And EVERYONE else says, "No, they aren't. You need to fix or replace your email program," and Sean says, "But his messages are messed up!" And, again, everyone else says, "They're okay," and instead of listening to everyone, you insist everyone is wrong. Yes, it's getting old. Please, deal with your own problem. If nothing else, download Thunderbird and use that for a while, just a few days, and see if you see PiT's messages as empty or with text. > That is why it seems like nobody can do no wrong but ME. I have enjoyed, > and continue to enjoy using OOo as I have for the past few years. That's your perception, but the truth is others may make mistakes, but they listen after a while. They don't keep blaming someone else when there is an avalanche of people saying, "No, YOU are the source of the problem, and HERE is how to fix it." So take advice and see if it works before complaining again. > The 3.2 developer's builds (and RC-1) have proven useful, helpful and > beneficial to me. > I'm afraid I can't say the same here. I am indeed disappointed. > But this is none of your concern. What is, however, is the news that I am > leaving immediately after posting this message > because it is now obvious we are certainly of no use to each other. Please, when you leave the state of Denial, come back and be part of the community. Hal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
