In news:[email protected], Barbara Duprey <[email protected]> typed: > Twayne wrote: >> In news:[email protected], >> Barbara Duprey <[email protected]> typed: >> >>> Twayne wrote: >>> >>>> In news:[email protected], >>>> Barbara Duprey <[email protected]> typed: >>>>
... >>>> >>> My "problem child" is a 1.6M file -- 15 pages, each with a >>> 5-column table containing a header row and 5 picture rows. >>> Above each picture is a line of text. Apparently just >>> reopening an existing file goes through repagination, for >>> some reason. Yes, I sure hope this issue gets some >>> attention. Do you think there's any point in opening an >>> issue, or would it just be closed as a duplicate? (I'm >>> sure there must be at least one out there already!) >>> >> >> IMO it might make it if if were phrased properly and >> concisely detailed, not sure. The hardest part is probably >> the research to find anything similar is already submitted >> and accurate - it's over a year since I've had anything to >> do with the issues sytem. Perhaps if it were tied tothe >> repagination process as that's a new revelatioin, at last >> to me. I suspect pagination of causing other things too, >> like the jumping cursor and not going back to where it >> originally was, and a couple other things I can't think of >> right now. If it relocates the cursor, then it could >> relocate images, I'd assume. I also noticed that captions >> also follow the right image when they get relocated - >> maybe that's due to anchoring, I don't know right now; it >> just occurred to me. Probably the worst part of getting >> them to look at this is I've never found a pattern to be able to >> predict when or if it may or >> may not act up. Like your example; I'd have predicted iit >> would be OK based on the infor you provided but it's >> getting toward the border line of the file sizes I've >> experienced it on. Good luck, >> >> Twayne > > I'll probably give it a shot -- at least I have a > relatively small file, and I just tried opening it five > different times. Each time the first problem is on page 5, > with the first picture row graphics moved down; sometimes > the text moved down, too, other times it stayed in place. > The other differences were less predictable, but I think > this would give them something to go on, since there's > repeatability (at least on my VistaHP/OOo3.1.1 system). If > you've got a different configuration, would you be willing > to give it a try and see what happens for you? Yes, I'd gladly give it a try. Interestingly, the graphics move up, not down here. I have XP Pro SP3, OO.o 3.2, but it was the same back on XP SP2 and OO.o 2.x and 1.x. It would be interesting if there were diffs between operating systems. BTW, what do you anchor the graphics to? My Word "imports" are all anchored to "character", which I change to "Paragraph" when I see them, but it seems to make no difference to anything. I've been told part of it's due to my not anchoring images properly, but when it's imported from Word, I shouldn't have to go inspecting all the anchors and besides, it seems to make no difference. HTH, Twayne` --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
