On 06/12/2010 07:53 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > I don't see any technical reason that several ODF documents couldn't > be stored within a single file. It could perhaps be as simple as a new > document type which is a zip file (as other ODF files are) within > which is a directory for each document with the current structure of > that document type. Such a file type would presumably have to go > through the standardisation process.
If several .ODF documents are added to a single archive file (e.g., .ZIP) then the unarchiver program can open the archive and display the contents. You have only to click on the file you wish to open in OOo and it opens without having to save to disk. This is the case in both Windows and Linux today, so why would it be included into another standard? This is true regardless of document type. Thank you! Tom -- "PC, "Where would you like to go today?" ... Mac, "Where would you like to be tomorrow?" ... Linux, "Are you guys coming, or not?"" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
