Peter Kupfer OOo wrote:
> As you are not subscribed, you may have missed this post.
>
> Doug Thompson wrote:
>> Ain Vagula wrote:
>>
>>> N.Kahl wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> #
>>>> I have just installed the LINUX-Version called SUSE 9.3, wich
>>>> contasins
>>>> OO.2.0 . Is that really OO? When I tried to open former written
>>>> Documents with the extension .sxc I got problems, and the former
>>>> "Star-Office" Documents, which  I could edit with OO1.1 without any
>>>> problems are no longer possible to open anyhow. OO2.0 writes Documents
>>>> with totally new extensions instead. Is that according to the Idea of
>>>> open Software? Or have I got a bad copy?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The version that comes with original SUSE 9.3 was in early beta
>>> state, you
>>> should upgrade to some of later milestones of OO.o from
>>> your-favourite-suse-mirror/projects/OpenOffice.org
>>> Yes, in 2.0 file format is changed accordingly to idea of open
>>> software to
>>> standardized OpenDocument format. Still, 2.0 reads and writes earlier
>>> formats without problems, when you have problems, please upgrade your
>>> application. Available milestones are also not final, so you can
>>> encounter
>>> another problems, but not so much any more.
>>>
>>> ain
>>>
>>
>> It's also important to note that the version supplied with SuSE9.3 is
>> built by Novell "based on OpenOffice.org".  They number it Version
>> 1.9.79.2.3 which isn't an OOo version number.  If you are having
>> problems with the Novell version, you should contact them first for
>> support.  Of course, you can always dump the Novell hack and install
>> a copy downloaded from the OOo site.  Then we'll know what you have
>> and how to help.
>>
>> Doug
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Thanks,

Kurt

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to