John, the OP (Tony Layland) was not subscribed, so David sent him a copy of his own response -- but
copied the list as well. so the subscribers saw it again. Sigh.
As has been pointed out *many* times, the current list management is far from ideal in the way
unsubscribed users are handled. Until/unless a better way is developed and agreed on, though, we
seem to be stuck with it. All the proposals made to date seem to have fairly significant flaws of
their own.
On 12/3/2010 3:55 PM, John Brooks wrote:
I did receive it so obviously I am on the list. Please remove it.
On 12/3/2010 3:37 PM, Brian Barker wrote:
At 18:02 03/12/2010 +0100, Marco Fioretti wrote:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 11:37:28 AM -0500, David B Teague wrote:
Some of the folks on this list didn't think you are subscribed. If that's true, you won't have
received this answer. So I have forwarded it to you.
David,
nothing personal, of course, but thanks for another proof of the OOo-users issues I recently
summarized here:
http://stop.zona-m.net/2010/11/a-proposal-for-effective-volunteer-friendly-user-support-in-libreoffice/
May I quote?
'The absolutely obvious consequences are that: [...] volunteers come and go, but only the good
but clueless ones that sincerely believe that this is a sensible "strategy" remain to provide
"support".'
That would be us, then?
;^)
Brian Barker
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
