Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 26 June 2005 06:19, Johan Vromans wrote:
Jonathon Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
lost. Being succesfully defended at court, the patent is quite
solid so noone can implement a smilar system for the next maybe
The prior art for that patent is 10 000 _years_ old.
And, did that help?
No one coming into this subject at the current discussion can get at
the ustpo.gov web site and check, either its down or the dns records
are kaput. One person even went so far as to say its /.'d :)
However if prior art can be produced, it can be set aside yet. My
question is, in order to give me a hint as to what it is not being
football (apologies to Andy Griffith), WTH are we talking about?
Comb overs
The patent, (from memory) is concerning a method of combing hair (using
three segments of hair, I presume from all three sides. I couldn't see
the pictures as I won't install quicktime/itunes.) to cover balld spots.
Funny? I thought so.
(Finally, a way I can actually CONTRIBUTE to the list.)
Paul (The other one.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
