On Sunday 26 June 2005 6:50 pm, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 17:52 -0400, Fred A. Miller wrote: > > On Sunday 26 June 2005 5:14 pm, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > > On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 16:40 -0400, Fred A. Miller wrote: > > > > On Sunday 26 June 2005 2:05 am, Peter Kupfer OOo wrote: > > > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > > > 2) If possible, d/l the latest 2.0 beta and see if the problem is > > > > > fixed. While it is not a short term fix, at least we will know that > > > > > the problem will be resolved when 2.0 comes out. > > > > > > > > No it won't, NOT unless coders realize that for Linux, OO MUST see > > > > what printer(s) are defined in CUPS, THEN all will be well. > > > > > > > > Fred > > > > > > I cannot verify your statement. 2.0 does, indeed, offer ALL defined > > > printers including a fax machine if you install one. > > > > Sorry.......It DOESN'T. Your statement might better be, "it's supposed > > to" and "often does" but it DOESN'T all the time. PLUS 2.0 is broken, in > > that you can't add a printer. > > > > Fred > > Fred, > > All I can say is that OOo2 does what I say on my system. I find that it > readily recognizes printers enabled via the OS tools. So you have one > dissenting vote.
As has been noted so often before, just because something works fine here, DOESN'T mean it does for you, nor anyone else. I've installed OO too many times to KNOW that this IS a problem than needs to be fixed. Fred -- Planet Earth - a subsidiary of Microsoft. We have no bugs in our software, Never! We do have undocumented added features, that you will find amusing, at no added cost to you, at this time. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
