On Monday 18 July 2005 08:09, Mixu Lauronen wrote:
> When you think of it, not pasting non-contiguous cells makes sense. I'll
> give you an example:
>
> Let's start with a simple table.
>
> 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E
> 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E
> 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E
>
> You select cells 1A, 2B and 3C and try to copy them to 2D. The result
> would be:
>
> 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E
> 2A 2B 2C 1A 2E
> 3A 3B 3C 3D 2B
> 3C
>
> Which is no good. I won't even start talking about possible formula or
> reference problems. And this is an easy case.
Please do *not* start a new question by replying to an old one as this causes
several problems:
1) most email software will correctly think that your email is a response to
the email you are "replying" to, and will indicate this by displaying your
email as a child of the original email
2) because of this, people not interested in the original email may ignore
your question
3) people may think that the original email has a reply(yours) so that they do
not have to give it a reply
So in conclusion, more people will read your email if it looks like the start
of a new thread rather than the reply to an old one.
As to your question, sorry, I've no answer, but please repost to see if anyone
else can help.
--
CPH : openoffice.org contributor
Maybe your question has been answered already?
http://user-faq.openoffice.org/#FAQ
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
