On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:03:20 -0700 (PDT), Alan Mead wrote: > Paul_B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> In short, another case of being frustrated by the way this >> program is organized. This is something I could do three ways in >> Word, easily. Sorry I wasn't more help. > > I recall very nearly destroying my 486 in frustration the first time > I used Word because it did not have a reveal codes... So, on the one > hand, I can sympathize with your frustration but on the other hand > this is just how it goes when moving from one program to the next. > > Have you seen slides of the new office 12? At least visually, OOo > seems closer to Word than the new Word does! > > -Alan
Interesting comparison. I think the lack of Reveal Codes is a very valid criticism of Word et. al. I'm in Word97, and no I haven't seen later versions. Frankly, my fave processor to this day goes back to Lotus Ami Pro 3.1, the most advanced WYSIWYG of its day. Shame they killed their own child for the disastrous Word Pro. It was downhill from there. p. -- Using OOo 1.9.125 on Win XP sp2. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
