For those interested, the issue is http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58451 and the last zipfile does pass the check via tools provided by the linguacomponent project. If these do not work, please work on them and submit ones that do work to the issue.
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 10:18 -0600, Gregory L. Forster wrote: > Hi Craig, > > I did some more experimenting. I used ConTEXT for all my > experiments. I downloaded many of GRS's files, but that didn't seem to > work. I edited the .idx file considerably and modified the dictionary > file considerably. When I executed OpenOffice, the word F??? was still > listed as an alternative to the word mishandle. Unfortunately, the word > mishandle is not the only word that lists F??? as an alternative, or > listed in the .dat file. There are hundreds more words, i.e. arse, > around, bally, bang, bastard, be intimate, bed, blinking, blockhead, > bloody, bloomer, blooming, blow, and blunder, just to name a few. It > seems that modifying the .idx file has no impact on the thesaurus.Only > attempting to modify the .dat file seems to do the trick. The reason > why I say, attempting, is that almost all of my attempts have rendered > the thesaurus inoperable. In fact, I even deleted the entire .dat file > to see if OO would still work, and it worked fine. Basically, the file > that has to be modified is the .dat file. Let me know if you come up > with anything > > Greg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PLEASE KEEP MESSAGES ON THE LIST. OpenOffice.org Documentation Co-Lead http://documentation.openoffice.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
