On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:32:16 -0500, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:

> CarlP wrote:
> 
>> Jonathon Coombes wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 10:41 -0500, CarlP wrote:
>>>
>>>> WinXP Home, OO 2, Athlon 1.7GHz
>>>>
>>>> Folks, I've yet to get any help on this, and it'll make or break my
>>>> ability to use OO for our organization.  BTW, I'm a staff of one
>>>> part-timer, and I've burned a lot of time on this already.
>>>>
>>>> My problem is with hiding or collapsing certain address lines when
>>>> there is no data in that field.  I've read a ton about how to do this
>>>> (using the Hidden Paragraph function with a "not" or "!" or "NEQ"
>>>> condition) but the "hidden" line remains hidden whether or not there
>>>> is data in the field on that line.  So it seems like hiding works, but
>>>> the condition does not.  There's no other info on that line (e.g. no
>>>> other fields, no other text, no spaces, etc.).
>>>>
>>>> For further troubleshooting beyond trying different syntax for the
>>>> condition, I've tried creating a new merge document from scratch using
>>>> the same data source.  That too has the same problem.
>>>>
>>>> What could I possibly be doing wrong, and how can I resolve this?  I
>>>> really want to use OO.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Carl,
>>>
>>> According to my knowledgebase, the hidden paragraph technique is known
>>> NOT to work with version 2.0 at this stage.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Jonathon
>>
>>
>>
>> Interesting, and thanks.  This is the first reference I've seen about
>> this issue.  It's a bit disappointing, and I'd hope the user guides,
>> tech articles, and related materials I waded through would explain the
>> correct way to do this, not the way that doesn't work.  Also, this seems
>> to me to be an important basic function of an office suite, so basic
>> it's hard to believe they'd release 2.0 without it.
>>
>> Carl
> 
> I think that the point is that this is a BUG and it should not have been
> released without it.
> Can you download and try one of the version 2.01 releease candidates and
> see if it is fixed there?

According to issues:
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56195
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36696

        it's targeted for 2.0.2

I only hope the useability issues have been addressed as well. For a Word
user who only has to select to include or not include blank lines, the
method used in openoffice is a real turn-off.


-- 

John

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to