On Sunday 01 January 2006 1:11 am, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: [snip]
> I was just doing this again, and can't get it to work properly, > even though I'm sure it was working before. The field is hidden > or displayed as it should be, based on the condition, but the > blank line remains if the field is hidden! I'm sure I've used a > hidden section used to remove the blank line as well as the > field, so I'm not sure what's going on... if it's me or 2.0.1 is > buggy, or what. [snip] This IS critical for a database application, no matter what platform. For example, there's a predefined recipe table supplied with OO, only it has just one "ingredient" field, which is incorrect if you're going to print well designed and printed recipes. You have to create enough "ingredient" fields to provide enough entries for the "largest" recipe you have, and obviously, when you do a merge in writer, you don't want a lot of empty lines included in your finished copy. Fred -- Paid purchaser of ALL SuSE Linux releases since 6.x --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
