that is the build of my installation.. thanks.. ( I feel better )
-----Original Message----- From: G. Roderick Singleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 5:08 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [users] Re: linux install of 2.0.1 has failed miserably cat /opt/openoffice.org2.0/program/versionrc 2.0.1 seems to be Build 8990 and version 680m1 at least on my windows box. On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 16:59 -0600, Kevin Tomasek wrote: > there is an soffice there.. > > thanks. > > the help about only shows 2.0 is there a way to find out if this is > truly 2.0.1? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Leslie Danks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 4:27 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [users] Re: linux install of 2.0.1 has failed miserably > > > Kevin Tomasek wrote: > > <snip> > > > now soffice is nowhere to be found!! find . -name soffice finds the > > old 2.0.0 version. starting soffice from the old location indicates > > that it is truly 2.0.0 . if i exclude the 2.0.0 version the find will > > > find no other soffice. > > I also installed 2.0.1 (under Suse Linux 10.0) and there were no > problems at all. Path to the exec is: > > /opt/openoffice.org2.0/program/soffice > > (i.e. different to where YAST put the earlier OO version delivered > with the distro). -- PLEASE KEEP MESSAGES ON THE LIST. OpenOffice.org Documentation Co-Lead http://documentation.openoffice.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
