So, what about ^(.+)$ in search ? And (<&>)=(<&>) in replace ?
I stand corrected regarding back references,
Well, I'm cheating. We were discussing the exact same topic a while
ago here and on other lists where Samuel is also a member. :)
and indeed using "*+" in the find and "(<&>)=(<&>)" works as
expected (no need in putting the paragraph markers since the scope
of the search is the paragraph anyway).
You'r right !
Jean-Christophe
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
