On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 17:14 +1000, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: > G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 11:18 +1000, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: > >> > >>I will send my version of the FAQ to you when I get it worked out > >>so it makes sense to me. > >> > > > > Not needed. 2.0.3 is around the corner and the fix is in it. Thus the > > item will go away very quickly. Please add it to your own faq if you > > like. > > > > I just looked at the release plan here: > http://development.openoffice.org/releases/OpenOffice_org_2_x.html > > which says 2.0.3 is planned for release on May 29. > > I don't call that "around the corner"... it's over 2 months away. >
Well I do :-) > Also, my understanding (which may be wrong) is that any document > created from a template under 2.0.2 will have to be fixed, and > people may not discover there is a problem until after 2.0.3 > comes out, if they don't update the template for some time. So > they may need this information months from now. > Could be. I have not experienced the problem but thought it serious enough to try to document the fix in the FAQ. See http://documentation.openoffice.org/faqs/word_processing/050.html or, if tinyurl is up, http://tinyurl.com/s5wx3 -- PLEASE KEEP MESSAGES ON THE LIST. OpenOffice.org Documentation Co-Lead http://documentation.openoffice.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
