On Wednesday 03 May 2006 22:54, Robin Laing wrote:

   As far as I know RAR is not an open-source project. So it cannot be used.

RL> WinRAR-Marketing wrote:
RL> > Dear OpenOffice.org Team,
RL> >
RL> > I am contacting you from win.rar GmbH, the official publisher of
RL> > WinRAR, with a proposal for cooperation. While viewing your website
RL> > at www.openoffice.org, I noticed that you offer your downloads
RL> > mainly in .tgz format. We would like to propose you to consider
RL> > adding the .rar format to your current download options. Since
RL> > RAR files can usually compress content up to 30 percent better
RL> > than ZIP, this would save downloading time for the people who
RL> > download files from your website.
RL> >
RL> > WinRAR is the most complete file compression tool available
RL> > on the market. It supports all RAR and ZIP archives, as well as most
 other RL> > popular archive formats. The RAR archiver is also available for
 Linux, RL> > MacOS X, DOS, OS/2 and  FreeBSD. Moreover, WinRAR is constantly
 being RL> > developed. Please check out our official website at
 www.win-rar.com for RL> > more detailed information about WinRAR.
RL> >
RL> > If you agree to offer .rar as a download option for your downloads, we
 would RL> > of course provide you with a license key for WinRAR, including
 all future RL> > updates, for free.  We also have a "Get WinRAR" button
 prepared for your use RL> > in order to lead your customers to our download
 site in case they are not RL> > familiar with our software.
RL> >
RL> > Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your
RL> > earliest convenience. You can reach me personally via e-mail or
RL> > call me at +49-421-639390.
RL> >
RL> > Thank you for your consideration!
RL> >
RL> > I am looking forward to hearing from you soon.
RL> >
RL> >
RL> >
RL> > Best regards,
RL> >
RL> > Davlatbek Aminov
RL> >    Marketing Assistant
RL> >
RL> > win.rar GmbH
RL> > Unser Lieben Frauen Kirchhof 10
RL> > 28195 Bremen
RL> > Germany
RL> >
RL> > www.win-rar.com         (website)
RL> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]   (e-mail)
RL> >
RL> > +49 421 63939-0  (tel)
RL> > +49 421 63939-99 (fax)
RL> >
RL>
RL> I for one actually think rar may not be that bad of an idea.  As many
RL> know, there are tools to make download easier and repair bad downloads.
RL>   I feel that if RAR can work in Usenet, then it should work for OOo.
RL>
RL> How many times are there complaints about damaged downloads?  With rar,
RL> a person could download a par2 file and repair their damaged files.
RL> Saving time and bandwidth to those that are most in need.
RL>
RL> The only issue I feel is OOo should find a cross platform supplier.  One
RL> that works on all the platforms that the users use, such as Linux, Mac
RL> as well as Windows.  Now if WinRAR can be cross compiled to work on
RL> these other platforms, then great, go for it.  Until then, hold off.
RL>
RL>

-- 

With best regards,
   Dmitri Koulikov

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to