If responsibility ends at making fun out of name then such admin should be fired ASAP. Or you are suggesting to measure responsibility in this way?
> -----Original Message----- > From: Fred A. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 10:59 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [users] MS Outlook > > Pete Holsberg wrote: > > [snip] > > > But Gerry, each of those has a fix available. Are you > suggesting that > > because these security holes keep being discovered, there > are bound to > > be more? > > > > Please don't think I'm an apologist for MS, but scanning > > <http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/> shows just one alert for > > OutHouse and that was back in January. > > > > I'm not advocating that anyone use OutHouse but I would > like to get to > > the truth about just how vulnerable it is. > > Responsible Sys. Admins., for example, call it "LookOut" and > "LookOut Express." I don't remember the number of alerts over > the past 12 months, but there have been quite a few. When > there are better SAFER mailers to use, then it donesn't make > any sense to use something that badly coded. > > Fred > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
