What may I ask does this have to do with OOo, itself? Please take this discussion to the appropriate mailing list. Hint: this is not the correct one for this!!!
Dan On Thursday 29 June 2006 11:47 am, Colin Sharpe wrote: > --- "R. W. Watkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > R. W. Watkins > > > > > > There's nothing wrong with criticizing someone for > > using the expression "for free", provided he or she > > is not guilty of utilizing other uneducated, > > 'upstart middle class' expressions, such as > > referring to one's offspring as infantile goats > > (i.e., 'kids') in even the most formal settings.... > > To advertise something as "Free of charge", the ideal > word to use is "Gratis". > ______________________________________ > > From the Oxford English Dictionary: > > gratis > /graatiss/ > > adverb & adjective free of charge. > > ORIGIN Latin, from gratia grace, kindness. > ______________________________________ > > I hate "For free" too. > > Colin. > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
