> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > There have been several other *threads* of email about this. There > > is absolutely nothing illegal, amoral, wrong, bad, evil, or > > not-right about what they are doing. > > > > On 8/16/06, Richard Detwiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Eternity_Dragon wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > just wanted to inform you about http://www-openoffice.com/. It > >> > seems their using "Open Office" for a software package. This > >> > might mislead people to use not real OpenOffice, but the one, > >> > they provide. This might be a problem. I thought you'll want to > >> > hear about this. > >> > > >> I clicked the link and it looks to me like it is in fact > >> OpenOffice.org that they are marketing. So I'm not sure where there > >> is any deception going on. > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > Chad said it much more clearly than I did, but that was the point that > I was trying to make also (no deception involved; nothing that they're > doing is wrong). Maybe the only picky point is that they should call > it "OpenOffice.org" (the official name) rather than "OpenOffice". > Isnot there something about OpenOffice is a trademark or registered mark. I think that is the reason that OO.org uses the org.
The site might be liable if this is correct. Chris --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
