Final question - I see "OOo_2.0.1_Win32Intel_install.exe" dated by 16th of august at ftp://ftp.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/openoffice/developer/OOD680_m1/
How come it is named as 2.0.1? Thanks. WBR, K. Palagin. > -----Original Message----- > From: Frank Schonheit - Sun Microsystems Germany > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 7:27 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [users] 2.0.5 vs 2.1 vs 2.x - how they are > related to each other? > > Hi James, > > > And to muddy the waters (add confusion to this). there are Release > > Candidates for each micro release. Thus OOD680_rc1 will be > the first > > release candidate for the 2.0.4 version. This may or may not > > correspond to any version of the OOD680 milestone (m) releases. > > Ehm, well, you can see it the other way 'round: Certain > milestones from the 2.0.4 branch (OOD680) will be declared as > release candidate. For instance, OOD680_m2 or OOD680_m3 > (don't know which) is going to be declared as "Release > Candidate 1". Still, it's an OOD680_m2 (or 3). > There is no such thing as a OOD680_rc1 (to my best > knowledge), only a "Release Candidate 1" internally being a > OOD680_m2 (or 3). > > Ciao > Frank > > -- > - Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - > - Sun Microsystems > http://www.sun.com/staroffice - > - OpenOffice.org Database > http://dba.openoffice.org - > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > - - - - - > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
