Hi Rakshit

Dear OpenOffice Team,

I'm not on the "OpenOffice Team", just a satisfied user, but I'd love to make a couple of comments.

I am using version 2.0 of OpenOffice. My request is that as a long-time
MS-Office user (and being quite comfortable with it!) it would help me
to know of the Features that OpenOffice offers which are not available
with MS-Office.

I use Microsoft Office at work, and am quite familiar with it. Over the years it has become a reasonable office suite, and has lost some of the shortcomings that frustrated me in its earlier days. (Yes, I'm getting old.)

Just to get it out of the way, one of OpenOffice.org's obvious advantages is price. At home, I would find it very difficult to afford Microsoft Office. I have a large family, and we have well over 10 computers. Microsoft require me to purchase one license per computer. I've never done the sums, and don't want to, but I imagine that adds up to more money than I would want to spend. I wouldn't want to spend the hundreds of dollars it costs for one copy!

In the business world Microsoft's option is also quite expensive. A few years ago I worked for a charity here in Australia that was offering computer training to unemployed people. Microsoft were quite generous, and offered us $15,000 (Australian) worth of software. Now, $15,000 is very generous, and we were very grateful. But what did that $15,000 get us? 10 Windows XP licenses, and 9 Office licenses: not quite enough for half of our computers.

So the price of OpenOffice.org (or lack of price) is definitely a significant advantage. But it's not enough to be cheap - I want the software to be good as well!

To summarise, let me say that virually any job that I can accomplish in Microsoft Office, I can also accomplish in OpenOffice.org. Sometimes the method is different, but the result is equivalent.

Additionally, there are some areas the OpenOffice.org does better than Microsoft Office (in my opinion). Some that I appreciate are:

- More effective styles. OpenOffice.org is "styles-centric", whereas styles feel like an add-on in Word. I get very used to using styles in the early 90's when I used the Ami Pro word processor, and desktop publishing software. I find it a very productive way to work.

- Automatic spell checking in Calc. People at work have been trying to do this with Excel for years, but it doesn't work.

- Auto-complete. I touch type, and usually hate features like this (and I know a lot of people hate it in OpenOffice - at least you can turn it off!). OpenOffice.org contains the first auto-complete function that I have found useable. When completing my thesis, it made my life much easier when typing long technical words.

- Draw. I find Draw close in usefulness to CorelDraw (but without many of the advanced features), and have been able to do many of the jobs I used to use CorelDraw for in OpenOffice.org now. (These are normally page layout and desktop publishing type of jobs.) Microsoft has nothing that compares with this.

- I find features like the gallery, navigator, and data sources very useful information in accessing extra data (database fields and graphics), and getting around the document. The navigator works very well, and almost makes up for the lack of an outliner in OpenOffice.org. Microsoft Word does have an outliner, but I never found it came close to the features and convenience of Ami Pro's and Ecco Pro's outlining. OpenOffice.org Impress does do basic outlining.

- OpenDocument support. The world now has a standard set file formats (ISO standards). OpenOffice has supported them for over a year so far. Microsoft does not (yet) support these formats, although they were on the committee that created the standard in the first place. OpenDocument is still in its early days, and I look forward to see what stand Microsoft will take in the future. But I already know where OpenOffice.org stands.

There are a few "extra features" to start with. I'm sure you'll hear of more. OpenOffice.org is free. Why not download it and try it out, and see if you discover any for yourself.

For completeness, and to be honest, here are a few things that OpenOffice.org doesn't do as well as Microsoft:

- Slower loading time, especially the first time you start the program.

- A few of the advanced spreadsheet features are more limited.

- Base is a more immature database compared with Access.

Also, there may be some (minor or major) compatibility issues with Microsoft. This isn't a "disadvantage" of OpenOffice, but may be something to be aware of if you are migrating. To comment on this, we would need to know more about your situation.

Hope this email isn't too long, and that you find it helpful.

Adrian




--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to