Benjamin Huot wrote:

  That is true, but it is open source and has all the features of the
latest version.

This would be debatable.  If NeoOffice.org were truely OpenSource, we
could use their code in OpenOffice.org, but due to the GPL, we cannot.

I have used the OpenOffice.org X11 version for several months, but it is
much harder to use as it doesn't release caps lock until you hit it a
specific number of times,  and the keyboard shortcuts for  cutting and
pasting are not correct for OS X.

These are fixed.  You can use the Cntrl and Command keys as you wish and
actually should be able to assign them as needed.

It is very difficult to manage the windows as OS X treats the entire
X-windows as one application.

This is a fault of Apple's use of X11 and not OpenOffice.org's problem. 
If you don't like this, tell Apple.  I work with UNIXes on a daily basis
and this problem exists there too (if you use raw X11 and not an
interface like Gnome or KDE.)

It is not a true port and the interface is not right for the Mac and
limits the ability of average people to use it.

Again, this could be debated.  It is a port that works on the Mac. 
Because it does not comply with the Apple HIG does not make/unmake
whether it is or is not a port.

This NeoOffice version is very stable and works great. Just because they
call it by another name and the interface is done by another developer
is no reason to tell people not to use it.

I'm telling the truth.  NeoOffice.org is the effort of two people.  If
they were to give up on it (and this was seriously contemplated earlier
this year), the project would die.  This has happened to other projects
that I have worked with.  OpenOffice.org enjoys the support of not only
Sun, but many other companies.

Obviously the OpenOffice.org developers don't consider the Mac platform
to be important. And not having a native Mac version is holding back
OpenOffice.org's adoption considerably.

There are those that would debate this.  Apple has donated the use of at
least four iMac's and Sun has donated worker hours of one of their
employees to move towards an Apple HIG compliant version.  Sun is very
aware of the large Apple audience.

I downloaded a presentation from one of the developers at Sun giving a
presentation and it was done with NeoOffice on the Mac even though it
only supported version 1.1 features at the time. It was only with 2.0
that the Mac version was installable without compiling code.

I understand your concerns.  Now OpenOffice.org is installable as a
'drag-n-drop' Mac application.  Yes, there is much to do, but if you
look back much progress was made.

My main concern is with the fragility of NeoOffice.org, not with the
quality of the product.  After working with the computer industry for
over 30 years, I've seen many products come and go, and quite a few of
them were 'one-man' shops.

James McKenzie

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to