On 23/10/06, Kirill S. Palagin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I oculdn't get it to run on a virtual machine with 512 GB RAM
> allocated to it. It would start, but it was 16 colours and
> completely unusable. This was a beta version, however, and
> maybe I should give the current RC a try.
Try, but on real hardware. You will be plesantly surprised.
If I had a 1GB machine to dedicate to testing operating systems, hehe,
I wouldn't be in the position that I am now. But I'm glad to hear that
the suprises waiting for a Vista user will be pleasant. I use Linux
because I find it to be a better OS than the current Microsoft
offering. Knowing that something better is in the works is good.
> It is not Vista's fault that some idiot bought DRM-protected
> media. It is the fault of the organisations that promote it,
> without explaining to naive consumers the drawbacks. The
> company behind Vista, Microsoft, is one of the companies
> promoting DRM. So yes, I do blame them, equally with Sony,
> Apple, and others.
Blaming and hatred is counterproductive. Vote with your wallet, do not
buy Vista and DRM-infected media.
Blaming is not counter-productive. To combat a problem you must
unerstand it's source. Hatred certainly is counter-productive.
However, I can't find any references to hate in this thread.
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com/what_is/drm.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
