Dan Lewis wrote:
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!!!
Snakes on a plane ?
Please discontinue this thread as it serves no useful purpose. I
also notice that some of the people posting to this thread have sent
CC to the OP. While it might stroke our egos to do this, I doubt that
the OP in enjoying these emails. It might even turn him or her
against OOo even more. The OP is even more likely to trash OOo others
who might otherwise use it.
Furthermore, it is wasting bandwidth.
Dan
On Thursday 26 October 2006 09:48 am, Kirill S. Palagin wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RBL
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 6:18 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [users] Re: OpenOffice ROCKS: was: Re: Openoffice suck
That said, the OOo development team should strive to beat
Excel performance at every turn.
Yep.
Perhaps there needs to be an optimization effort. Performance is
one area I find open source, in general, often lags.
Totally agree (and I can't understand how people could claim
otherwise).
There are not that many left. Certainly less than in OO. And
fixing clear defects does not seem to be high on OO team
agenda.
How would you know? Do you have access to the bug list? I
suspect you do. ;-)
If I do not encounter the bug, I consider it non-existant ;-).
I'm not knocking MSFT Office. I'm simply applauding OpenOffice.
I support it, and look forward to the developers optimizing it
further, and hammering out the bugs.
Again, I am with you on this.
Regards,
K. Palagin.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
