My compliments to Fred. Your points are clear and accurate. At one time I swore by Microsoft. As I learned more, I have grown to avoid Microsoft products as much as possible. In that regard, I respect and appreciate OO. When I say to myself "I wish OO worked just like MS Office," your reminder about one version of Word may not be compatible with another version rings true -- very true. I've even tried MS Office 2007 beta. I hated the new menu options which meant relearning how to use MS Office.

Thanks you to the developers of OOo and too all the volunteers on this forum


On Nov 7, 2006, at 12:40 AM, Fred Moore wrote:

On Monday 06 November 2006 9:28 pm, Glen wrote:
I pulled up a document done in MSOffice which had numbered paragraphs.
When I attempted to insert additional text the numbering got
out-of-whack. I see when I start a new OOo document up with numbering it goes much smoother. So, it seems the translation from an original MS
doc to OOo Writer isn't totally clean.  This is probably back-burner
stuff for the developers, but with more people learning about OOo,
they'll need to bring their old MS files with them and go back and
forth, perhaps more so going forward.

I felt a need to chime in here. For some reason people who use Word and OO think things should go back and forth perfectly. But they don't expect different versions of word to do the same thing. WHY do you do this? I have
never been able to figure this out..
I simply can't understant this simple minded ness..  Example: create a
document with the latest version of Word and then attempt to open it with a 3 version back copy of Word. You get a simple message. "You must use a newer version of Word". This simply is called Vendor Lockin. You accept this but openly state that OO is broken because the document doesn't look EXACTLY
the same. or in this case the "conversion is not clean"

Now to OO at least OO attempts to open the document, no matter what version, no matter what format it was stored in. It may not look exactly the same but the data is there and the data is intact. The glit (presentation) may look
different but so what..

I guess my point is simple.. if you accept vendor lockin don't go looking for EXACT replacements in the open source community. Just keep buying what you already have. Don't expect the program to look EXACTLY the same, Don't expect the program to work EXACTLY the same. DAM MS can't make things look exactly the same that why you get the buy me now message. Their solution is to move
to the latest version (read buy). ...

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to