Walter Hildebrandt,

About two weeks ago I commented on the fact that your way of handling Calc workbooks opening in seperate Windows leaves something to be desired. I used Calc to do a single page edit on a school progress report. Underlined headings, square block markers and text. Since I am now porting to OpenOffice, I am on a learning curve and as I am used to, I went into my do-read-do routine. This cannot be done, since the help window will open over the workbook, but when you again click on the workbook, the help window disappears. I knew to minimize the workbook from previous experience and there it was. At first I decided not to report on this since it seemed to me you found my comment negatively critical and unpleasant, but something else which I think relates to the philosophy of handling windows came up. I have a self-designed and built program, which can, from a Design page on a worksheet - by annotated drawings, accept the concept and design of a melamine kitchen, then calculate all related activities like pricing, structures, billing, orders, quotation pages, profit margins, cut lists and the like. Once the design is complete I print all the forms. This beastie is about 6.9 MB in size, with about 20 worksheets, formatting that's afraid of nothing and it has an alter ego about 7.5MB in size and about 22 worksheets for gate motors, comprehensive fencing needs, intercoms and other security work. After I opened, call it Kitchens, I wanted to open, call it Roads. The reason being that on the Design page in Kitchens, I found a very old version of the programming and to check on my own madness, I wanted to cross reference. Kitchens opened well enough after some delay understandably becasue it is convering from Excel. Roads opened similarly, yet stuck somewhere before adapting row height in the conversion process. Microsoft now has two similar automatic error reports on this problem. In systems design, twenty seven years ago, we were warned about this kind of conflict of similar programs needing to address the same resources. In Assembler especially you had to be careful not to overwrite your own househeeping. I did training with Control data Institute on the Cyber 18. This is not bragging, you need to know my reference framework. Besides your single workbook/window setup being difficult to work with (when I am busy with a difficult design task, I do not want the app in my face), it seems it simply does not work.

Here are the detail of my computer's System Information.

OS Name    Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition
Version    5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 Build 2600
OS Manufacturer    Microsoft Corporation
System Name    XXXXXX
System Manufacturer    FUJITSU SIEMENS
System Model    D2190-A
System Type    X86-based PC
Processor    x86 Family 15 Model 4 Stepping 1 GenuineIntel ~2660 Mhz
BIOS Version/Date FUJITSU SIEMENS // Phoenix Technologies Ltd. 5.00 R1.10.2190, 2005/04/07
SMBIOS Version    2.31
Windows Directory    C:\WINDOWS
System Directory    C:\WINDOWS\system32
Boot Device    \Device\HarddiskVolume1
Locale    United Kingdom
Hardware Abstraction Layer Version = "5.1.2600.2180 (xpsp_sp2_rtm.040803-2158)"
User Name    XXXXXX/Yyyyy
Time Zone    South Africa Standard Time
Total Physical Memory    512.00 MB
Available Physical Memory    199.96 MB
Total Virtual Memory    2.00 GB
Available Virtual Memory    1.96 GB
Page File Space    1.19 GB
Page File    C:\pagefile.sys


If Microsoft Office can handle it, why cannot you? It is past the point already. I do not beef, criticize or comment lightly. I do not do so without reason or in a negative frame of mind. I understand that one cannot even appear to be cribbing the thing, copyright besides, but there are too many other similar things between MS and OO, it is past the point. Then again, it may be some philosophical decision in "Head office" bedeviling you. This is wrong. It detracts from an otherwise seemingly excellent product, which I however cannot get to use, never mind assess in fairness.

As it is, with only your minimized recovery dialog and this e-mail active (except 40 porcesses in Windows Task Manager), Speedfan says my my CPU usage is 100% at 56degrees Celsius (132 Fahrenheit). In the meanwhile the recovery dialog went down and now there is 1.5% usage at 57 Celsius because the fan slowed down. This does not work, my computer normally does not work this hard. Now I have to hand code a Kitchen against a deadline. How much money will I lose through errors? Moot.

It beggars belief that you want to engender loyalty to open source. Someone once said; "don't build if you don't have a good painter". It's the small things. Only delivery counts. Fix it and do not delay. Also do not tell me anything about "operator porting" or learning curves. Sun Micro has been in contention with Microsoft for years. You don't win it from the low ground. I am a Commodore Amiga A500 user of about twenty years standing, but (forced by circumstance) I had to reluctantly adapt my fiercely partisan stand in the face of the excellent usability of Excel. The above mentioned spreadsheets started life in ProCalc from a company in the UK. Sys Info then was 4.7MHz, 3MB RAM, 40MB HDD, 4096 colors on the screen and a mouse. The Workbench OS was loaded on a dedicated ROM. Daphne programmable video chip, Fat Agnus Blitter (block image transfer at 4000 lines per second), Copper co-processor, programmable audio chip and others. First true multi-tasking, multi-processing PC on the street in South Africa in 1987. Could handle C, it's standing on the floor behind me as I type. Must still look on the net for support, if any.

Thanx,
Chris.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to