Try to autofilter 2000 rows with one of these. Took minutes for me. MINUTES (with my old 450 MHz rubbish)! Not milliseconds.
Johnny Andersson 2007/3/19, NoOp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 03/18/2007 05:19 PM, Johnny Andersson wrote: > If you have an old machine, I wouldn't update to ver 2 (of course you can > try if you want to). If you do you will probably spend most of your time > with it waiting for something to happen. It's terribly slow on older > machines, such as my old 450 MHz 320 MB Dell Dimension from late > 1998. But you didn't say anything about your hardware, so maybe this > isn't the case for you. > > I run OpenOffice.org 2.1 on a 1.6 GHz 2 GB laptop and it works well. It's > not very fast, but I can live with it, and if I can, most people usually > can… > > Maybe very irrelevant information, you will probably notice it anyway when > you update. > > Johnny Andersson I run OOo 2.1 & 2.2(rc3) on: 300Mhz 284Mb - 2.2(rc3) + StarOffice8 330Mhz 256Mb - 2.1 450Mhz 256Mb - 2.1 + StarOffice8 650Mhz 256Mb - 2.2(rc3) + StarOffice8 under linux & they all run just fine. I see no reason not to update. Do you have any reason to believe that 1.1 runs faster than 2.x on those processors? (I've not tried the earlier versions in awhile so I'm just curious). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
