Johnny Andersson wrote:
Okay, I understand that there is a difference between the two
And this answers the original question.
but still, 17 seconds is a very long time.
<snip>
Does it really have to take THAT long?
<snip>
I guess this depends on how many and how big
macros I have, doesn't it?
Yes
What are the advantages for me as a user to use the slow method if I
want to
run a macro?
I see no particular advantage and as such, would opt for "lazy load".
This would be less performant as you moved from library to library, but
the delay would likely be very small. On the other hand, the current
implementation was likely easier to write. This would probably be an
easy place to contribute some nice changes if you happen to be a
programmer type with time on your hands.
Not that I really need this function at all, since I always assign
macros to
key combinations... <snip>
I usually run my macros directly from the IDE or a button that I place
in the document.
<snip>
Packard Bell EasyNote laptop, 1.6 GHz, 2 GB, the HDD seems to be a
Seagate
Momentus 5400.3 ST9160821A 8MB 160GB
Impressive!
--
Andrew Pitonyak
My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt
My Book: http://www.hentzenwerke.com/catalog/oome.htm
Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php
See Also: http://documentation.openoffice.org/HOW_TO/index.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
