John W. Kennedy wrote: > Pueblo Native wrote: >> jonathon wrote: >>> You are forgetting the anti-SLAPP statutes. Any patent >>> related litigation on unenforcible patents will be viewed as >>> being nothing more than a SLAPP. > >> Isn't that assuming that the case will be filed in a California court? >> There is no such SLAPP law on the federal books. > > No, but there are common-law rules about frivolous and vexatious suits, > waiting to be applied, and we can all pray that SCO v. IBM be the > occasion of these rules being reawakened.
Yes - and the possibility of that happening is quite good. Fred -- This message originated from a Linux computer using Open Source software: SuSE Linux 10.2. (Linux is like a wigwam - no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside.) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
