Well, in that case, I did remember wrong so my bad. The domain name did sound familiar.
Russell Butler wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> On Wednesday 30 May 2007, Pueblo Native wrote: >>> http://www.valusoft.com/products/officesuite.html >> >> The marketing page does appear to be a reface/rename of Openoffice.org >> >> Here is the EULA link for the product. >> >> http://www.valusoft.com/navigation/eula.html >> >> If this software really is from the Openoffice.org code they are in >> deep dodo! Because they would be in direct violation of the GNU LGPL >> that Openoffice.org is licensed under. >> >> I have been all over the Openoffice.org site and there does not >> appear to be any official contact group. >> >> If there is an official group for Openoffice.org they need to check >> these links real close because there is a violation of the LGPL, IF >> AND ONLY IF the source code really is openoffice.org source code. The >> violation would be becuase of the other products EULA and NOT because >> of the name/face change or the price. >> > > Hi all > > Looking at the documentation for Office Suite 2005 the manual refers > to 602 PC Suite. The screen shots in the manual do not look like OOo > as I know it. I think 602 has been around for a while and as far as I > know is not related to OOo. If so there should be no question of > infringing OOo licensing. > > I don't use Windows and they decline to ship the CD internationally, > so I am excused from sampling the product on two counts. > > FWIW the supported file types do not include ODF and the photo editor > does not seem to be a rip-off of the Gimp. > > Russell > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
