On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 09:31:22 +0100 Harold Fuchs wrote: > On 26/06/07, Michael Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <snip> > > > Perhaps letters to standards institutes in various countries from > > > interested citizens/subjects would, in fact, have more impact than > > > signing petitions, if only by letting bureaucrats know that at the > > > very least, their decisions were being watched by others than > > > lobbyists. But to my mind, this is less a motivation for not > > > signing the petition in question here than for sending a letter in > > > addition to signing the petition.... > > >
Just a quick follow up. I have been buoyed by Standards New Zealands Position as follows: *** QUOTE *** On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 15:12 +1200, SNZ External wrote: > > Unfortunately the specific contact for this Standard is in hospital at > the moment but the details sent to customers who emailed their > concerns in March is this: > Thank you for emailing your concerns, Standards New Zealand > did not support the proposal. Standards New Zealand will get > another opportunity to vote on the document now that it is > presented as a Draft International Standard for balloting, at > which stage we will also presumably not support it. > I have forwarded your feedback to the appropriate person as well for > their noting. > > Regards > > Kim Laurenson *** END QUOTE *** -- Michael Linux: The OS people choose without $200,000,000 of persuasion. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
