An interesting question...I'd love to learn more about it.  Here's an
interesting article I found..
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Anyone have more information on this?

Quoting Michael Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 02:10:40 -0400
> Ayaz Hussain wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was wondering about the nature of how some open sourced programs
> > like OpenOffice are able to open and save to file formats used on
> > other platforms such the Microsoft Word .doc file format. If reverse
> > engineering is not allowed in the license agreement for Microsoft
> > products and the only way to know how the .doc format works is through
> > reverse engineering to enable programs like OpenOffice to be able to
> > handle the files, then is it not license infringement? After all the
> > product is closed-source for a reason...even if it is "clean reverse
> > engineering", that becomes irrelevant, no?
> >
> > I don't ask this to speak ill of OpenOffice. I like it and use it, but
> > I want to know that it is entirely legitimate so that I am not a party
> > to any sort of copyright infringement practices.
> >
> > All I know is that the proprietary formats like .doc are not open to
> > outsiders, and hence for programs like OpenOffice to be able to
> > manipulate such files means that knowledge could only have been gained
> > though reverse engineering, because surely Microsoft didn't willingly
> > share it with us...
> >
>
> Comes down to who you believe owns the data in your document. With
> DOC it was reasonably clear the document author did, and Microsoft
> would not have challenged this during the antitrust suit days. With
> DOCX Microsoft started by saying they owned the data in the EULA. With
> OOXML they did an about face because of the openness of ODF.
>
> More info which talks about how it is not necessarily illegal to
> reverse engineer programs, which are usually better protected than data
> by law:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_engineering#Binary_software
>
> --
> Michael
> Linux: The OS people choose without $200,000,000 of persuasion.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to